Legal Opinion

Lee v. Pittsburgh Coal & Mining Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided March 15, 1877PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is an action to recover for commissions alleged to be due plaintiffs upon the sale of coal for defendant, under an agreement made with the plaintiffs by defendant’s president and manager, in October, 1873, by which plaintiffs were to act as defendant’s agents at Buffalo for the sale of its coal to Canadian railroads, and to receive a commission of ten cents per ton on all coal sold and delivered.

When the former appeal in this case was before us, we held, and are still of the opinion, for the reasons then given, that the plaintiffs, if entitled to recover for commissions on. any part of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. OakleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  2. Fister v. La RueNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Mumford v. HawkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Clarke National Bank v. Bank of AlbionNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  5. F. M. B., of K. v. . B. D. Bk.New York Court of Appeals · 1857

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. 45 John Lofts, LLC v. Meridian Capital Grp. LLC (In re 45 John Lofts, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
  2. G. V. B. Min. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HaileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  3. Lord v. United States Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Cox v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  5. Model Clothing House v. HirschIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API