Legal Opinion
F. M. B., of K. v. . B. D. Bk.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 5, 1857PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The jury in this case have found, upon sufficient evidence and under proper instructions from the court, that the plaintiffs were holders, for value, of the checks in question. Each of these checks, if duly certified imposes upon the bank an obligation to retain the amount for which the check is drawn, and which, by the certificate,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State of Illinois v. DelafieldNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Stoney v. American Life InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
- Laverty v. BurrNew York Supreme Court · 1828
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Arnold v. National Bank of WaupacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Lee v. Pittsburgh Coal & Mining Co.The Superior Court of New York City · 1877
- Gifford v. Town of White PlainsNew York Supreme Court · 1881