Cook v. Ceas
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Peter J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
The appeal is from a judgment rendered upon a guardian’s bond. The plaintiff, whose maiden name was Ceas, and who is the daughter of defendant George T. Ceas, while still a minor, became or was the owner of some property, and her father George T. Ceas was appointed by the probate court of Sacramento County as guardian of her person and estate, and in compliance with the requirement of the court, on April 2, 1883, entered into a bond in the sum of three thousand dollars, with C. P. Hensley and P. H. Gar-diner as sureties. The plaintiff having arrived at age April 30, 1897, and her father as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- In re Estate of SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Barnes v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Cook v. CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Guardianship of CeasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- McGibbon v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Donovan v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.