Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Armacost

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1915No. 12237PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Kauffman, J., entered December 29, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for fraud.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In the latter part of the year 1912, the respondents, Crawford and wife, were the owners of certain farm lands situated in Benton county. At the same time the appellants, Armacost and wife, owned a half block of land in the city of Ellensburg, which contained five lots and on which there were several dwelling houses. At the time named, a proposition was made that the parties exchange properties, and after some negotiations, an exchange was made in January, 1913.

During the pendency of the negotiations leading up to the exchange, the city of Ellensburg was improving the streets in front of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Gray v. ReevesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Grant v. HuschkeWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Daniel v. GliddenWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Carpenter v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Suraci v. BallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. United States v. Certain Property Located in Borough of ManhattanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Petersen v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Linch v. CarlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Marion v. Grand Coulee Dam HotelWashington Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API