Legal Opinion
Atmel Corp. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 11, 2005No. C 04-04082 SIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF SHELLY KNOX
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On October 7, 2005, the Court heard oral argument on plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part plaintiffs motion, and DENIES defendant’s motion to strike the Supplemental Declaration of Shelly Knox.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Atmel Corporation (“Atmel”) is a company that manufactures computer chips. Atmel obtained general…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clarendon National Insurance v. Insurance Co. of the WestDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- Intergulf Development LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Janopaul + Block Companies, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- The Housing Group v. Pma Capital InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Sierra Pacific Industries v. American States InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.