Legal Opinion
The Housing Group v. Pma Capital Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 2011No. A127581PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McGUINESS, P. J.
Defendants PMA Capital Insurance Company, as successor in interest to Caliber One Indemnity Company, and Caliber One Management Company appeal from an order, filed November 19, 2009, denying their petition to compel arbitration of a dispute concerning attorney fees to be paid to an alleged Cumis counsel.1 (See Civ. Code, § 2860, subd. (c).) We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On July 10, 2007, plaintiffs The Housing Group, Golden State Developers, Inc., Castro Valley Associates, LR, and Castro Valley, Inc., commenced this lawsuit against their insurers defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Haskel, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Janopaul + Block Companies, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Swanson v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Baek v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- J.R. Marketing v. Hartford CasualtyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- LA Terminals, Inc. v. United National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.