Legal Opinion

Pitt v. Sunderland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 5, 1982No. 16-81-06435, CA A22089Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from an order in a habeas corpus proceeding sustaining a demurrer1 to his replication to the return to the writ. The order appealed from provides: “It is ordered that the demurrer be sustained, with plaintiff being allowed to plead further.” An order sustaining a demurrer is not appealable. J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton, 287 Or 709, 601 P2d 1254 (1979). No order dismissing plaintiffs petition has been entered. See Scott v. Cupp, 55 Or App 23, 637 P2d 173 (1981).

Appeal dismissed.

Proceeding by habeas corpus is a civil proceeding. Holland v. Gladden, 229 Or 573, 368 P2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of DaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Holland v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Scott v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API