Legal Opinion

Holland v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The warden of the state penitentiary appeals from a judgment in favor of the prisoner in a post-conviction proceeding. The prisoner has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that service of the notice thereof was made upon his attorney only, and not upon himself as required in the case of an appeal by the state in a criminal action. ORS 138.110; State v. Garrett, 72 Adv Sh 1041, 228 Or 1, 363 P2d 762.

While the remedies available to convicts under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (ORS 138.510 to 138.680) ordinarily involve questions of criminal law, these remedies essentially augment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smallman v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Barber v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. ANDERSON Ex Rel POE v. GLADDENOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. GarrettOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden Oregon State Penitentiary v. Paul Courter HollandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Atkeson v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Holland v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Pitt v. SunderlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API