Legal Opinion

Scott v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 7, 1981No. 124,829, CA A21112PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiff, an inmate of the Oregon State Penitentiary, appeals an order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

Plaintiff petitioned in the circuit court for a writ of habeas corpus and subsequently filed a replication as authorized by ORS 34.670. Defendant moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the replication did not state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim for relief.

Plaintiff does not contend that the replication was sufficient and concedes that dismissal is proper in most actions where the pleadings fail to state a cause for relief. His sole…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bedell v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Pitt v. SunderlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API