Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Mondelez Int'l, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION No. 15-6057PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

PRATTER, District Judge

David Robinson claims that his former employer, Mondelez International, terminated his employment because of his age. Mondelez now seeks summary judgment in its favor, arguing that it had a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason to terminate Mr. Robinson’s employment, given his less-than-stellar track record. Mr. Robinson counters that his job performance was good and that there were younger employees with worse performance issues whose employments were not terminated. After hearing oral argument, the Court will grant the motion.

Background

David Robinson claims…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DeCicco v. Mid-Atlantic Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. HILL v. APP-TEC INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
  3. HOLLINGSWORTH v. R HOME PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. MANOLOPOULOS v. LOUIS DEJOY, POSTMASTER GENERALDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. MAY v. PNC BANKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API