Legal Opinion
Pasquale v. Law Offices of Nelson & Kennard
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 15, 2013No. Case No. 11-cv-05265-JCSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOSEPH C. SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Dana Pasquale brings this action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq. and the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“Rosenthal Act”), Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1788 et seq., alleging that telephone messages left on her home answering machine by Defendant Law Offices of Nelson & Kennard (“Nelson & Kennard”) did not comply with § 1692(e)(ll) because they failed to disclose that Nelson & Kennard was a debt collector.1 Nelson &…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Guerrero v. RJM ACQUISITIONS LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Wilhelm v. Credico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michael Davis v. Hollins LawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Kagan v. Selene Finance L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Forkum v. Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Schaired v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023