Legal Opinion
Forkum v. Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 22, 2014No. Case No: C 13-0811 SBA; Docket 33PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge
Plaintiff James Forkum (“Plaintiff’) brings the instant action against Defen*961dant Co-Operative Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (“Defendant”) alleging claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq., and California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“RFDCPA”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1788 et seq. See Dkt. 16. The parties are presently before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. 33.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael Davis v. Hollins LawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016