Legal Opinion

Akatsuka v. McKay

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1919No. 1099PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error, to Circuit Court, First Circuit. Hon. S. B. Kemp, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

This action, on the case for damages was instituted by K. Akatsuka, plaintiff and plaintiff in error, against TV. A. McKay, defendant and defendant in error, in the circuit court of the first judicial circuit. The plaintiff asked judgment against the defendant in the sum of $15,000 for actual and punitiAm damages. The allegations of the complaint may be summarized as ío11oaas : That defendant was and is the district magistrate of Wailuku, County of Maui and Territory of Hawaii; that on the 7th day of May, 1916, a police officer filed a complaint charging the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. SandsNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Foster v. AldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Pahukula v. MaguireHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Hang Fook v. Republic of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Ferreira v. KamoHawaii Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Territory of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hewahewa v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kaohelelani v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Shilhan v. HoHawaii Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API