Legal Opinion

Hewahewa v. Lalakea

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1923No. 1447PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*545OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PETERS, C. J.

This is an action at law to quiet plaintiff’s title to an undivided one-seventh interest in fee in and to the entirety of or undivided moieties in twenty-five pieces of real property enumerated in the schedule attached to the complaint.

Both parties claim through a common source of title— their father T. K. Lalakea who died May 7, 1915, intestate —the plaintiff as one of his heirs at law, the defendant as grantee in a deed of the premises in question alleged to have been executed and delivered by his father to him on‘March 6, 1915.

The heirship of plaintiff…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. German-American National Bank v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Shults v. ShultsIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Allred v. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Porter v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Holstein v. BenedictHawaii Supreme Court · 1915

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. CadinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Boteilho v. BoteilhoHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Estate of Ellen Yin v. Acme Matt. Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Makainai v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Maki v. City of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API