Legal Opinion

Hang Fook v. Republic of Hawaii

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Writ of Error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Bickerton, J.

The plaintiff in error, Hang Fook, and one Ah Kau, were charged jointly and convicted in the District Court of Honolulu, on a charge of selling and furnishing opium contrary to law; an appeal was taken to the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, and the case tried at the August Term of said Circuit *594Court with a jury on the same charge as that made in the District Court, the verdict' being a unanimous one of guilty. A motion for a new trial was made by Hang Eook, which was denied, and exceptions were taken to the denial of said motion, which exceptions were…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hewahewa v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Akatsuka v. McKayHawaii Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Kaohelelani v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API