Legal Opinion

U. S. National Bank v. Erickson & Terteling & Sons

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff The United States National Bank of Portland commenced a suit against the defendants R. L. Erickson, dba R. L. Erickson Company, J. A. Terteling & Sons, Inc., and J. H. Wise & Son, Inc. The trial court at the close of the evidence determined that the matter was triable as an action at law. No objection to the trial court’s ruling was made, and all parties waived the right to a jury trial. Findings of fact were made and a judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendants for the sum of $22,800, together with attorney’s fees and costs and disbursements. From this judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Flaherty v. BookhultzOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Salem King's Products Co. v. RampOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Topolos v. SkotheimOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. United Brokers Co. v. DoseOregon Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Schmeck v. BogatayOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. United Finance Co. v. ANDERSONOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Callaghan v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Oregon Farm Bureau v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API