Callaghan v. Reed
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1ConcurrenceButtler, P. J.
Although I concur with the majority opinion in affirming the judgment of the trial court, I am not sime that I understand its reasoning and would like to state my reasons for concluding that the agreement is enforceable.
The agreement starts out clear enough: Charles and Zelma agreed that Charles would purchase from Zelma the real property in question for the sum of $97,230, and the farm machinery for the sum of $5,100, for a total purchase price of $102,330. The purchase price was to be paid by Charles’s conveying to Zelma certain described real property (which he did), for which Zelma…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- U. S. National Bank v. Erickson & Terteling & SonsOregon Supreme Court · 1956