Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Callaghan v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1980No. 8569, CA 13328Published

1ConcurrenceButtler, P. J.

Although I concur with the majority opinion in affirming the judgment of the trial court, I am not sime that I understand its reasoning and would like to state my reasons for concluding that the agreement is enforceable.

The agreement starts out clear enough: Charles and Zelma agreed that Charles would purchase from Zelma the real property in question for the sum of $97,230, and the farm machinery for the sum of $5,100, for a total purchase price of $102,330. The purchase price was to be paid by Charles’s conveying to Zelma certain described real property (which he did), for which Zelma…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. U. S. National Bank v. Erickson & Terteling & SonsOregon Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API