Legal Opinion

Flaherty v. Bookhultz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1956PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*464WABNEB, CJ.

This appeal comes to us from a judgment in what the appellant denominated a suit in equity, but which the trial court apparently thought and treated as an action at law. The plaintiff sought to recover judgment for commissions earned under an oral contract of employment to sell certain machinery and equipment for the defendants, Bookhultz and Biley — co-partners doing business as Geo. E. Zweifel & Co. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendants appealed.

As indicated by the foregoing statement there is a sharp…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elliott v. MosgroveOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Templeton v. BocklerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Huebener v. ChinnOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Smith v. HowellOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Williams v. HerringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Bahler v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Milwaukie Construction Co. (Inc.), a Corporation, F. H. St. Pierre and Mary St. Pierre v. Glens Falls Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. Schroeder v. SchaeferOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Briscoe v. PittmanOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lenchitsky v. H. J. Sandberg Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API