Legal Opinion
People v. Tirado
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1984No. Docket Nos. 15210, 15556PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STANIFORTH, J.
On this consolidated petition for writ of habeas corpus and appeal, defendant Francisco Javier Tirado contends his plea of guilty to robbery of a Chula Vista shoe store is void and violates due process because it was the result of presumptive as well as actual vindictive prosecution. Tirado also asserts he was rendered ineffective assistance of counsel due to his attorney’s (1) failure to raise the meritorious defenses of presumptive and actual vindictive prosecution and (2) failure to seek dismissal of the robbery charges on the grounds (a) the prosecution’s failure to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. PanizzonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. ValliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.