Archer v. City of Grand Rapids
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.
The city of Grand Bapids, being-desirous of building a civic auditorium, negotiated with Hugh H. Archer, and other owners, plaintiffs herein, to purchase their respective parcels of property in the west side of the city. The city vacated public thoroughfares affording access to plaintiffs’ properties, but has not closed them. The plaintiffs claim that the city entered into binding contracts of purchase and sale, while defendant city claims that it only secured options, of which, it never availed itself, but which by subsequent action it expressly decided not to exercise. This question is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hawarden v. Youghiogheny & Lehigh Coal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Groh v. FlammerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Carrier v. Bernstein Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Austin v. HaydenMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Niklaus v. Abel Construction CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
- Briggs v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Gableman v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Jones v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1936