Legal Opinion

Niklaus v. Abel Construction Company

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1957No. 34145PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action brought by William Niklaus “for the benefit and in behalf of the City of Lincoln, Nebraska, a body politic,” as recited in the caption of the petition and as recited in the body of the petition “for benefit of city of Lincoln.” The defendants are Abel Construction Company, a corporation, and “Universal Surety Company.”

The petition recited that plaintiff is a citizen and taxpayer and that the city of Lincoln is a municipal corporation operating under a Home Rule charter. It recited that a demand upon the mayor and city council to bring the action would be useless and that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Paradise v. NowlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Madison Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Committee on Water PollutionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Bennie v. Triangle Ranch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Nelson v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,038 Randolph Phillips v. John E. Tobin, Ralph K. Gottshall, and Alleghany CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Downtown Disposal Services, Inc. v. The City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  5. R. J. Edwards, Inc. v. HertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API