State v. Crisler
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.
— Mistie B. Crisler appeals the judgment on a jury verdict that she was guilty of second degree theft. She contends that the prosecution for theft was barred on double jeopardy grounds. We affirm.
The parties have submitted an agreed report of proceedings, which is the sole record for review. Pertinent portions are paraphrased below.
On December 9, 1991, Ms. Crisler and another woman entered the Lamonts store in East Wenatchee. After some discussion, they each grabbed an armload of clothing and ran out the door. Store personnel chased them, and they dropped the clothing. It was later recovered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. VladovicWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. GockenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GockenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- In re the Personal Restraint of PercerWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re PercerWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.