In re the Personal Restraint of Percer
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairhukst, J.
In 1996, Stephen J. Percer was convicted of multiple felonies, including vehicular homicide and second degree felony murder, stemming from one death. The Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions on direct appeal. In 2001, Percer filed a personal restraint petition (hereafter PRP), claiming, as he had in his direct appeal, that conviction for both crimes violated double jeopardy. The Court of Appeals ruled that the convictions violated double jeopardy and vacated the conviction for second degree felony murder. We find that the Court of Appeals could consider the PRP; however, we do not find a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. AdelWashington Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.