Legal Opinion
Lutton v. Baker
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 11, 1919PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from Johnson District Court. — R. P. Howell, Judge. The plaintiff asserts that he is an “innocent purchaser” of a note made by Baker to LeGrand, and that he is entitled to have a lien established to secure payment of said note. The trial court gave him judgment against Baker, and established the lien as prayed. Baker appeals. Le-Grand made default.-
1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.
I. Plaintiff filed what he styles “Petition in equity.” It states his claim of title to the note. It alleges that, subsequent to the making of the note, Baker *755made a written assignment to LeGrand, assigning to Mm:
“$475.00 and interest out of my share of the estate of my father Joseph Baker, deceased, of Johnson County, the same being to secure a certain note for the amount of $475.00 and interest, and hereby agree that the said amount shall be paid out of.the proceeds of the estate of my said father that shall be due to me and I also agree that the administrator of the estate of my father…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Sperry v. HorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Estate of Philpott v. PhilpottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Campbell v. WilcoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Fisher v. TrumbauerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Farmers Savings Bank v. NeelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Grimes Savings Bank v. McHargSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Farmers National Bank of Oskaloosa v. StantonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Richardson v. CheshireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Solomon National Bank v. BirchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.