Legal Opinion
Rozbicki v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 18, 2008No. AC 29290PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Zbigniew S. Rozbicki, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the reprimand issued to him by the defendant, the statewide grievance committee (committee). The committee affirmed the decision of its reviewing committee, reprimanding the plaintiff for a violation of rule 3.1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (2005). On appeal to this court, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that there was clear and convincing evidence that he violated rule 3.1. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Brunswick v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Turner v. American Car Rental, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
4Cited by5 opinions
- Perez v. D AND L TRACTOR TRAILER SCHOOLConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF NEW HAVEN v. DeRocheConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. RozbickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Rozbicki v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Rozbicki v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009