Legal Opinion

Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Rozbicki

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 5, 2017No. SC19796PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The defendant, Zbigniew S. Rozbicki, an Attorney, appeals 1 from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following presentment by the plaintiff, Chief Disciplinary Counsel, concluding that he had violated rules 3.1, 8.2 (a), and 8.4 (4) of the Rules of Professional Conduct 2 and suspending him from the practice of law for a period of four years. In challenging the trial court's judgment, the defendant raises a multitude of claims, including the following: (1) that the trial court violated his constitutional right to due process; (2) that the allegations in the presentment were barred under…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Lighthouse Landings, Inc. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Notopoulos v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. McMahon v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Tirado v. City of TorringtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Forgione v. ForgioneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API