Legal Opinion
Taylor v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1927No. 7539PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRIEBER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as the defendants, were charged with Ulif J. Harris, Henry Rothman, and Steno Lamento, in three counts of the indictment, with violations of the Anti-Narcotic Act (Comp. St. §§ 6287g-6287q). Lamento entered a plea of guilty, and a severance was granted to Rothman.
Upon a trial, the defendant Harris was found not guilty, the defendant Taylor guilty on all three counts, and the defendant Nichols guilty on the first and third counts and not guilty on the second count. Motions for new trials by both of these defendants were…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Raffel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Arnstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- United States v. NoveckSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- McHenry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Finnegan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
- Little v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Harper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Crapo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.