Williams v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Associate Justice.
The defendants were convicted of the crime of abortion. The indictment contained the negative averment that the operation was not necessary to preserve the life or health of the woman on whom it was performed. No evidence was offered by the government to support this negative averment, nor was the issue raised by the defendants. Their only defense was a denial that they had performed the operation.
At the close of the trial the defendants moved for a directed verdict and later for a new trial on the ground that the prosecution had failed to show that the abortion was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. VuitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. FleischmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fredrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- State v. BrechonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- People v. MaloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.