Legal Opinion

Finnegan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1953No. 14573_1PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment following conviction on Counts I and II of an indictment consisting of five counts. Counts I, II and III charged the defendant with receiving compensation from certain named parties for appearing on behalf of the parties named before an agency or department of the United States Government, the defendant then being the duly appointed, qualified and acting Collector of Internal Revenue for the First Collection District of Missouri, and as such was an officer in the employ of the United States. Counts IV and V charged the defendant with…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. United States v. MantonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  4. Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  5. Shushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. United States v. BorelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. Richard J. RabbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. State v. SpicaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. United States v. William RaglandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. Benjamin Dranow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API