Legal Opinion

Raffel v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 7, 1926No. 307PublishedCited by 363 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mk. Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Raffel,' with another, was indicted and .twice tried for conspiracy to violate th¿ National' Prohibition Act. Upon the first trial, a prohibition agent testified that, after the search of a drinking place, Raffel admitted that the place belonged to him. On that trial Raffel did not offer himself as a witness, and the jury failed to reach a-' verdict. ' Upon the second trial the prohibition agent gave similar testimony. Raffel took the stand and' denied making any such statement. After admitting that he was present at the former trial, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Fitzpatrick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Reagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. State v. BartlettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by363 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

358 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API