Legal Opinion

Frick v. Amtrak

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 3, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2011-0357PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge

In this case, plaintiff sued the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) for injuries he allegedly suffered in January 2008 while traveling on an Amtrak train bound for Chicago from the District of Columbia. Am Compl. [Dkt. # 24] at 1. Claiming that Amtrak breached “a duty of care to ensure [that he, as a passenger,] was not injured by Amtrak’s negligence,” id. ¶ 2, plaintiff seeks $1.5 million in actual and punitive damages. Id. ¶ 6. Specifically he claims that “Amtrak breached its duty of care to Frick because ...…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gerry Scott v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Cobell v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Cordova v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
  2. Mendoza v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  3. Montgomery v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  4. Scott v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
  5. The Chamberlain Group LLC v. Overhead Door CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API