Legal Opinion
Mendoza v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 28, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2022-1241Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TEDDY MENDOZA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) Civil Case No. 22-1241 (RJL) ) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN ) AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ft MEMORANDUM OPINION (June ©% , 2024) [Dkt. #33] In this negligence action, plaintiffs Teddy Mendoza and the Estate of Valerie Hale allege that they were injured due to the negligent operation of a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) train in June 2019. Pending before the Court is WMATA’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #33]. Because plaintiffs have produced no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grimes Ex Rel. Estate of Grimes v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- District of Columbia v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Toy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- District of Columbia v. PetersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.