Legal Opinion

Festi v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1932No. Appeals 159 and 160PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfei®, J.,

These are appeals by defendant company from the judgments entered on verdicts in favor of minor plaintiff and her mother, in an action of trespass for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff, by reason of the falling upon her of a heavy machine, known as a boarding machine or dryer, while she was at work in the mill of H. C. Aberle & Company where she was employed.

The defendant, Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., is a manufacturer of machinery, and among the various kinds of machinery manufactured by it, are stocking drying machines, known as dryers. These dryers,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Simonton v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Thatcher v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Byrne v. Henry A. Hitner's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Brooks v. Buckley & BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Robson v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Pennsylvania Smelting & Refining Co. v. DuffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Dougherty v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Vaughan v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  5. Ridgeway v. Sullivan-Long & Hagerty, Inc.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API