Brooks v. Buckley & Banks
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart,
Buckley & Banks had a contract with the City of Philadelphia to furnish men and trucks for the purpose of removing snow and ice from the streets between curbs. Brooks, one of their employees, was injured while at work. His employers were ordered to pay compensation, and they appeal. The question we must decide is whether appellants, Buckley & Banks, or the City of Philadelphia, is responsible for the payment of compensation.
' Appellants’ position is that, because the city is a municipal corporation, it was under a duty to keep its highway free and clear for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Simonton v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Tarr v. Hecla Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Allen v. WillardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Kelley v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- William Rolick v. Collins Pine Company and Collins Pine Company, T/d/b/a Kane Hardwood DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Venezia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.