Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Smelting & Refining Co. v. Duffin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1949No. Appeal, 177PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

We are concerned here with the not unfamiliar problem of determining the party legally responsible for the negligence of a borrowed employe. The controlling test in such a case is well established; it is whether, in the particular service which the employe is engaged to perform, he continues liable to the direction and control of his general employer or becomes subject to that of the party to whom he is lent or hired. The criterion is not whether the borrowing employer in fact exercises control but whether he has the right to exercise it: Dunmire v.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. McConnell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Siidekum v. Animal Rescue League of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Thatcher v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Robson v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Kelley v. Summers Pacific Employers Ins. Co. v. Kelley (Two Cases). Kelley v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  5. Phelps v. Paul L. Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API