Legal Opinion
PALLCO ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Beam
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 2005No. C047314PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
Cross-complainant Pallco Enterprises, Inc. (Pallco), appeals from a judgment of the trial court finding that advertising displays erected on the property of cross-defendants Denton and Carolyn Beam (the Beams) are not a public nuisance. Pallco contends the court erred in deferring to the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) on the nuisance issue and otherwise misapplied the provisions of the state Outdoor Advertising Act (hereafter the Outdoor Advertising Act or the Act) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 5200 et seq.) and its associated regulations. We affirm the judgment.
Fact…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
- County of Los Angeles v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ronald A. Baptist v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Summit Media, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Bandt v. Board of Retirement of San Diego County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Total Outdoor Corp. v. City of Seattle Department of Planning & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Estate of ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017