Summit Media, LLC v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIMES, J.—
SUMMARY
This is the second appeal in a dispute among several outdoor advertising companies and the City of Los Angeles over certain billboards with digital displays. In the first appeal, we affirmed the trial court’s finding that a settlement agreement between two of the companies and the city, allowing the companies to digitize many of their existing billboards, was illegal and void, because a municipal ordinance expressly prohibited “ ‘alterations or enlargements’ ” of such signs. (Summit Media LLC v. City of Los Angeles (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 921, 924 [150 Cal.Rptr.3d 574]…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Julian Union Elementary Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Investco Mgmt. & Dev. LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- City of Oakland v. Police, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Millview Cnty. Water Dist. v. State Water Res. Control Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
- Heron Bay Homeowners Ass'n v. City of San Leandro, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.