Wise v. Burton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a new trial in an action of ejectment, in which the main question is the location of the boundary line between two ranchos,—Jesus Maria and La Purissima. The line in controversy is a part of the east line of the former ranch, and the west line of the latter. Both parties claimed under patents from the United States,— *167that of the Jesus Maria dated 7th of September, 1871, and that of the Purissima, 12th of October, 1882. The court must have found that the evidence showed the western boundary of the Purissima was on a line farther west than that contended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McIver Lessee v. Walker and AnotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Vance v. ForeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Chapman v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Eddelbuttel v. DurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Serrano v. RawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Weaver v. HowattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- United Truckmen, Inc. v. LorentzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- City of Los Angeles v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Millard v. . SmathersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.