Legal Opinion

Brown v. . Polk

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: The plea in abatement was properly overruled. Hawkins v. Hughes, 87 N. C., 115. The causes of action are different in the two suits. A final judgment in the action brought in Yanee County would not support a plea of res judicata in the subsequent proceeding instituted in "Warren County. This is one of the tests of identity. Bank v. Broadhurst, 197 N. C., 365, 148 S. E., 452. In short, the two suits are unlike: the causes of action are not the same; and the results sought are dissimilar. 1 C. J., 56. This renders the plea in abatement bad.

Nothing was said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. . SalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Hawkins v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Murchison National Bank v. BroadhurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. Hamlet Ice Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Whitehurst v. HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Bechtel v. . WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Taylor v. . SchaubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API