Legal Opinion

Murchison National Bank v. Broadhurst

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The question involved: Where plaintiff in a creditor’s bill, in an action instituted in Johnston County, demanded judgment upon a $100,000 note and subsequently instituted an action in New Hanover County on the same note, should the second action be abated as to those who are defendants in both actions? We think so.

Plaintiff, a creditor, joined in a creditor’s bill to set aside certain conveyances made by F. K. Broadhurst, by way of mortgage on lands in Johnston County on the ground that they were fraudulent and void as to creditors. The action must be tried in that county, subject to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Southern Distributing Co. v. CarrawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Chapple v. National Hardwood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Long v. . JarrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Emry v. . ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Heinecke v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bowling v. Fidelity BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Brown v. . PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API