Legal Opinion

Sloan v. CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1958No. 246PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenNY, J.

The plaintiff’s assignments of error Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 are directed to the refusal of the court below to permit plaintiff to introduce in evidence Section 233, Ta/ble 3, page 69, of the National Electrical Safety Code, issued 15 August 1949, by the United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Standards, which the plaintiff contends contains the clearance requirements between a power line carrying 12,000 volts and a telephone line. The defendant did not concede the correctness of the plaintiff’s contention and objected to the introduction of the Code as well as the proffered evidence based…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Yeary v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  5. Atkins v. White Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Swaney v. Peden Steel CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Koury v. FolloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Slade Ex Rel. Slade v. New Hanover County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API