Legal Opinion
Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Atlanta, B. & A. Ry. Co.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided June 6, 1924No. Nos. 156, 187, 188PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBEEY, District Judge.
The Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railway Company grew out of a consolidation of other railroads and a reorganization perfected in 1915. The reorganization left an im*175portant part of the system known as the Atlantic & Birmingham Railroad under a precedent mortgage in which Old Colony Trust Company, a corporation of Massachusetts, is trustee, and left the whole system under a mortgage, subject to the former one, in which Equitable Trust Company, a corporation of New York, is trustee, and under a third mortgage, subject to both the preceding, in which Columbia Trust…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Burnham v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Gregg v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Continental Trust Co. v. W. R. Bonsal & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- C. C.T. S. Bk. v. M., B. S.R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Muscatine, Burlington & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Piedmont Corp. v. Gaines-Ville & N. W. R. Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1929
- McCook v. Groton & Stonington Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928