Legal Opinion

Continental Trust Co. v. W. R. Bonsal & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1934No. 3646PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the trustees of the three general mortgages of the Seaboard Air Line Railway Company from an order according priority under the “six months” rule to certain supply claims filed with the railway receivers. No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the net operating income to pay these and other claims filed, without resort to the corpus of the property, and there is no effort to have the claims declared a charge on the corpus. The trustees contend that the claims do not represent operating expenses but are for supplies furnished for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Burnham v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Gregg v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Virginia & Alabama Coal Co. v. Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1935
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. In re St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1936
  4. In re Wisconsin Cent. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1946
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. FlournoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API