Legal Opinion

Hav-A-Tampa Cigar Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 19, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITFIELD, J.:

Appellant in effect contends (1) that Chapter 20446, Acts of 1941, proscribes only such signboards as are described by sub-sections (b), (c) and (d) of Section 9 of the statute and that the maintenance of appellant’s advertising signboards is not forbidden by such subdivisions (b), (c) and (d); (2) that if subdivision (a) of Section 9 is applicable to appellant’s advertising signboards, then such subdivision (a) violates Sections 1 and 12 of the Declaration of Rights and the due process clause of the Federal Constitution; (3) that if subdivision (a) of Section 9 is construed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dutton Phosphate Co. v. PriestSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Whitaker v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. State Ex Rel. Hosack v. YocumSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. Joint Ventures, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  5. Sarasota County v. BargSupreme Court of Florida · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API