Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hosack v. Yocum
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 3, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chapman, J.,
— It has been made to appear by petition for writ of habeas corpus that Bud Hosack has violated Section 1 and Israel Pearl has violated Section 2 of Ordinance No. 502 of the City of Miami Beach, Florida, and that the Ordinance which the petitioners were charged with violating is invalid. Sections 1 and 2 of the Ordinance, supra, are viz.:
“Section 1. It shall be unlawful for the driver of any taxicab or other passenger vehicle for hire, while engaged in such occupation within the City of Miami Beach, Florida, to solicit the patronage of any passenger in the vehicle driven by him…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Dutton Phosphate Co. v. PriestSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Goldstein v. MaloneySupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Levy v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- King Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Miami v. KayfetzSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- City of Miami Beach v. Fleetwood Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
- City of Miami Beach v. the Texas Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Florida State Board of Architecture v. SeymourSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Telophase Soc. of Fla., Inc. v. STATE BD. OF FUN. D. & E.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.