Legal Opinion

Gillikin Ex Rel. Gillikin v. Gillikin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1958No. 92PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

"A plea in bar is one that denies the plaintiff’s right to maintain the action, and which, if established, will destroy the action.” McIntosh, N. C. Practice and Procedure, Sec. 523; Bank v. Evans, 191 N.C. 535, 132 S.E. 563.

If the alleged compromise and settlement is established, plaintiff’s action is barred; but, it should be noted, defendant pleads in bar a consummated compromise and settlement.

Ordinarily, it is for the trial judge, in the exercise of his discretion, to determine whether in the circumstances of a particular case a plea in bar is to be disposed of prior to trial on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reid v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Winkler v. Appalachian Amusement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Murchison National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. DeLoache v. DeLoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Deloache v. . DeloacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Unnamed Physician v. Commission on Medical DisciplineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Jones v. MathisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Seibold v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API