Legal Opinion
Homestake Mining Co. v. Mid-Continent Exploration Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1960No. Nos. 6203, 6244-6247PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITEN STEIN, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated appeals present a variety of issues dealing with the respective rights of the parties in the mining and milling of uranium ore in the Ambrosia Lake region of New Mexico.
Mid-Continent Exploration Company, the lessee of an area herein referred to as Section 11, entered into an agreement with Dunn Brothers for the operation of the leases by Dunn Brothers. Rio de Oro Uranium Mines, herein referred to as Rio, succeeded to the rights and obligations of Dunn Brothers.
J. H. Whitney & Co., White, Weld & Co., San Jacinto Petroleum Corp., and United…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Leeb v. Guy (In Re Guy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Klein v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- J. Edward Day v. William H. AveryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Rodriguez v. Whiting Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.