Legal Opinion

Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 4, 1951No. 352PublishedCited by 343 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The United States brought this civil action to prevent and restrain violations of the Sherman Act1 by appellant, *595Timken Roller Bearing Co., an Ohio corporation. The complaint charged that appellant, in violation of §§ 1 and 3 of the Act,2 combined, conspired and acted with British Timken, Ltd. (British Timken), and Societe Anonyme Frangaise Timken (French Timken) to restrain interstate and foreign commerce by eliminating competition in the manufacture and sale of antifriction bearings in the markets of the world. After a trial of more than a month the District Court made detailed findings of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by343 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

338 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API