Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Schwartz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1914No. 11851PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered November 20, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action for conversion, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On August 23, 1912 , the respondent Schwartz, trading under the name of Alaska Junk Company, made a conditional sale of personal property, consisting of a steam boiler with fittings, to the Pacific Coast Glass Company. The property was delivered on the following day, and within ten days from that time, the vendor of the property caused to be filed in the auditor’s office of the county wherein the vendee resided a memorandum of the conditions of such *210sale. The opening and closing clauses of the memorandum read as follows:

“These presents witness:
“That The Alaska Junk Company, of Seattle, King…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barry v. CoombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Drury v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  3. Anderson v. Wallace Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Delaware Insurance v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Deep River National Bank's Appeal From CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kennery v. Northwestern Junk Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. State Ex Rel. Yates-American MacHine Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Jennings v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Sunel v. RiggsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Herrick v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API