Legal Opinion

West v. Jewett & Noonan Transp., Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 12, 2018No. Docket: Cum–17–448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphrey, J.

[¶ 1] The crux of this dispute on appeal is whether, when the defendant has caused a physical invasion of the plaintiff's property, the plaintiff must present evidence of a specific diminution in market value in order to successfully prove nuisance.

[¶ 2] Jewett and Noonan Transportation, Inc. (Jewett), appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Horton, J. ) entered upon a jury verdict awarding Kathleen and Erik West (the Wests) compensatory damages in the amount of $490,000 on the Wests' claim of nuisance. Jewett contends that the trial court (1) erred when it denied…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Batchelder v. Realty Resources Hospitality, LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  2. Charlton v. Town of OxfordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. Johnston v. ME. ENERGY RECOVERY, LTD. P'SHIPSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Profit Recovery Group, USA, Inc. v. Commissioner, Department of Administrative & Financial ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  5. Darling's Auto Mall v. General Motors LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DEMMONS v. ND OTM LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023
  2. HIGGINS v. HUHTAMAKI INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
  3. HIGGINS v. HUHTAMAKI INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API